"At the point where the fuselage hit the wall, it seemed to simply melt into the building." Penny Elgas, Pentagon Is this a holographic 3D projection by means of a sub-atomic particle beam? Tom Mahood: "The ability to project an object of apparent solidity to enemy radar, instantly manipulatable, would be a most valuable little toy to have in your bag of tricks." Really? And the ability to project an object of apparent solidity to enemy TV-CAMERAS, would be even more a valuable little toy to have in your bag of tricks. What does this remind you of? The strange airplanes on 9/11 perhaps? "[...] soon both sides will have the ability to use holograms and other IT manifestations that will offer the opportunity to completely fool one another [...]" Timothy L. Thomas, FMSO All photos of the second plane which had hit the South Tower showing a achromatic (!) "watzit" very similar to the object at Nellis AFB regarding its surface appearance. To date there is only one known photo showing "Flight 175" in distinct colors, but this photo could have been easily forged. Was "Flight 175" (and also "Flight 11" and "Flight 77") created with a particle beam and black technology from Area 51? Sounds stupid? May be, but anyway take a look at this hologram: Very interesting date too: Sept 11th 2002 (!) Now compare it with this one... ...and with this one: Notice any similarities? By the way: Since flying holograms are usually very silent, the jet sound was produced by a cruise missile hidden within the hologram. Is this insane? Yes it is, but sometimes the truth is insane. This is not my fault at all. "It sounded to me like a missile, a high-pitched scream and a roar followed by an explosion, my mind was...