|
MrWhy.com » Videos » Fox Television v. FCC Oral Argument (December 20, 2006) |
|
|
Fox Television v. FCC Oral Argument (December 20, 2006)
|
Fox Television v. FCC Oral Argument (December 20, 2006)
U.S. Court of Appeals - 195903-1-DVD - Fox Television v. FCC Oral Argument - Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission. Fox Television was challenging the FCC’s indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to punish broadcasters for indecent speech. The network contended that the FCC sharply changed its standards for profanity, that the standards were vague and made little sense in the face of industry changes. The FCC fined Fox for language used by Cher and Nicole Richie on the live broadcasts of the 2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards, respectively. Language used may offend some viewers.  Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see
Video Length: 0
Date Found: April 17, 2011
Date Produced:
View Count: 0
|
|
|
|
|
I got punched by an old guy, for farting near his wife. Read MoreComic book creator Stan Lee talks the future of the medium in the digital age. Panelists Zachary... Read MoreThe U.S. launch of Spotify is still on music lovers' minds. Join Zachary Levi, from NBC’s... Read MoreTuesday: Rupert Murdoch testifies before Parliament on the hacking scandal that brought down "News... Read MoreAfter a long slump, the home construction industry may be showing signs of life. But as Bill... Read More | 1 2 3 4 5 |
|
|
|